Today's Veterinary Practice

MAY-JUN 2017

Today's Veterinary Practice provides comprehensive information to keep every small animal practitioner up to date on companion animal medicine and surgery as well as practice building and management.

Issue link: http://todaysveterinarypractice.epubxp.com/i/815220

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 53 of 113

PEER REVIEWED 9. Fiani N, Arzi B. Diagnostic imaging in veterinary dental practice. JAVMA 2009;235:271-273. 10. Carle DS, Shope BH. Diagnostic imaging in veterinary dental practice. JAVMA 2012;241:1283-1285. 11. DuPont GA, DeBowes LJ, eds. Atlas of Dental Radiography in Dogs and Cats. St. Louis, MO: Saunders Elsevier; 2009. 12. Peralta S, Verstraete FJ, Kass PH. Radiographic evaluation of the types of tooth resorption in dogs. Am J Vet Res 2010;71:784-793. 13. Peralta S, Verstraete FJ, Kass PH. Radiographic evaluation of the classification of the extent of tooth resorption in dogs. Am J Vet Res 2010;71:794-798. 14. Amory JT, Reetz JA, Sanchez MD, et al. Computed tomographic characteristics of odontogenic neoplasms in dogs. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2014;55:147-158. 15. Bar-Am Y, Pollard RE, Kass PH, et al. The diagnostic yield of conventional radiographs and computed tomography in dogs and cats with maxillofacial trauma. Vet Surg 2008;37:294-299. 16. Arzi B, Cissell DD, Verstraete FJ, et al. Computed tomographic findings in dogs and cats with temporomandibular joint disorders: 58 cases (2006-2011). JAVMA 2013;242:69-75. 17. Campbell RD, Peralta S, Fiani N, Scrivani PV. Comparing intraoral radiography and computed tomography for detecting radiographic signs of periodontitis and endodontic disease in dogs: an agreement study. Front Vet Sci 2016;3. 18. Soukup JW, Drees R, Koenig LJ, et al. Comparison of the diagnostic image quality of the canine maxillary dentoalveolar structures obtained by cone beam computed tomography and 64-multidetector row computed tomography. J Vet Dent 2015;32:80-86. 19. Tsugawa AJ, Verstraete FJ. How to obtain and interpret periodontal radiographs in dogs. Clin Tech Small Anim Pract 2000;15:204-210. 20. Lommer MJ, Verstraete FJ, Terpak CH. Dental radiographic technique in cats. Compend Contin Educ Pract Vet 2000;22:107-116. 21. Floyd MR. The modified Triadan system: nomenclature for veterinary dentistry. J Vet Dent 1991;8:18-19. Nadine Fiani Nadine Fiani, BVSc, DAVDC, is an assistant clinical professor of dentistry and oral surgery at Cornell University College of Veterinary Medicine. She has an interest in education and a clinical interest in endodontics and zoo dentistry. Dr. Fiani received her veterinary degree from the University of Sydney and completed a rotating internship followed by a 3-year residency in dentistry and oral surgery at the University of California, Davis. Before her current position, Dr. Fiani spent 3 years in private referral practice in Sydney. Santiago Peralta Santiago Peralta, DVM, DAVDC, is an assistant professor of dentistry and oral surgery at Cornell University College of Veterinary Medicine. His clinical and research interests include the microbial pathogenesis of dental diseases, comparative aspects of maxillofacial birth defects, comparative aspects of maxillofacial imaging, and molecular mechanism of oral tumor formation in dogs and cats. Dr. Peralta received his DVM from Universidad de La Salle in Bogota, Colombia, and completed a 3-year residency in dentistry and oral surgery at the University of California, Davis. Notes on Images All radiographic images provided are representative examples that support the explanations presented in the article. They are displayed based on labial mounting and considered to be of diagnostic quality. Some of the images have been cropped, but the structures of interest have not been altered or enhanced. All images were acquired following standard technique for small animals 19,20 using a commercially available dental radiography unit (Heliodent DS, Sirona, Bensheim, Germany) and a computerized radiographic processor using phosphor plates of size 0, 2, or 4 with corresponding software (CS7600, Carestream, Rochester, NY). Due to space limitations, most radiographs shown are from dogs. In case some readers are unfamiliar with other accepted systems (ie, modified Triadan), anatomic dental nomenclature is used here. 21 For more information, interested readers are encouraged to consult a more specialized source. The College of Veterinary Medicine at Cornell University (CVM) owns and retains the copyrights to all images. The CVM grants permission to use the provided images within the context of the articles titled Interpretation of Dental Radiographs in Dogs & Cats – Part 1: Principles & Normal Findings and Interpretation of Dental Radiographs in Dogs & Cats – Part 2: Normal Variations and Abnormal Findings. 50 IMAGING ESSENTIALS

Articles in this issue

Archives of this issue

view archives of Today's Veterinary Practice - MAY-JUN 2017